The Violent Men Is 1954's Grown-Up Western
![]() |
| Richard Jaeckel About To Be Sorry He Bullied Glenn Ford |
Brian Garfield of splendid book Western Filmssaid Ford was the best natural horseman on film. Better even than Joel McCrea?, asked someone, to which I say could-be, after seeing flat-out riding inserts Ford does across Lone Pine location of The Violent Men. Brakes applied were Code-mandated. Glenn and men stage an ambush of barn burners, killing but a handful despite force enough to take down a small army. "Only show violence where necessary to advance plot" was understood rule, so desire to see villainy really get theirs is frustrated. Men shot in the back go down bloodless, even as George Stevens showed a year before how much death can hurt at point of gun in Shane. The Violent Men was a first in Cinemascope for
![]() |
| Never Trust Barbara Stanwyck To Hand Off Needed Crutches During a House Fire |
Columbia was for grandeur where affordable, but cut most corners they'd approach. A cattle stampede looks like stuff of bigness, but hadn't we seen those same cows run in
A lot felt westerns had been in short pants too long. Sex became an element pushed hard after the war. The Outlaw and Duel In The Sun would pioneer at that. Leave simplistic cowboys to Saturday youth and juice up your "A" oaters. But wasn't The Violent Men more of the same cattleman vs. homesteaders stuff? And hadn't Shane just covered, and definitively so, that topic? To play down obvious comparison, Men went over to opposite sex for novelty. There'd be a bad (or at least unworthy for Glenn Ford) girl, her counterpart in despot Robinson's daughter, and then ultimate bad of Stanwyck doing Double Indemnity on range terms. Hapless Ford had hands fuller of women than guns.









0 Yorumlar